The end of third quarter has passed, spring has sprung, and the final push toward graduation reminds us that this time of year belongs to our seniors. The seniors have lots of good memories to look back on and an impressive array of accomplishments to be proud of. They have been accepted to many excellent, selective, and competitive colleges, they have won prestigious awards and achieved both inside and outside the classroom. Whether they realize it or not, they are part of one of the most progressive eras in CDS history. Although we have had computers in the school for many years, never before have teachers integrated the use of technology in the classroom as they have this year. If I had to describe the class of 2010 in terms of their education at CDS I would call them the first truly digital class.
And yet, putting a label on this class does not do them justice. Obviously they consist of unique individuals who, when examined on their own merits, remind us that each label is either misleading or simply wrong in terms of describing the individual members of this class. I did not know these students before I arrived in the high school. In fact, it is fair to say that I know the juniors, sophomores and freshmen much better than I know the seniors having worked with the former in the middle school. But I can honestly say that I have grown very fond of these students and have developed relationships with them that I will cherish and remember.
Occasionally there are events or decisions that strain those bonds or challenge those relationships. Recently I had to shut down the senior lounge and I took no pleasure in doing so. I also even feel a bit reluctant to share this information with you because, in many ways, I consider it a private matter–between me and the seniors. However, I know it will be a very public issue and has already become a topic of discussion so I will share my thoughts.
I don’t know the history of the lounge but I can honestly say I have been uncomfortable with its existence since I arrived in high school. It is not that I do not trust the seniors, but it is an issue of concern for many reasons. The lounge is very private–part of its point, I suppose–and it is difficult for me to walk by and know what is going on. As the principal, I must know what is going on at all times, and not being able to simply look and know makes me uneasy. I have to go out of my way to see if everyone is behaving and following the rules. However, it also means I cannot know at a glance if everyone is safe. If something happened to a student who was alone in the lounge, I might not discover it for a long time.
I understand the seniors’ desire for a place of their own. I don’t agree that it should be a private place, but I understand the territoriality of groups. The senior lounge went beyond marking a special territory for the seniors. It gave them a private place and definitely elevated their position in the high school as a social group. At the same time, it posed a major inconvenience for me and my responsibility as their guardian. Nevertheless, I inherited the situation and I lived with it.
The seniors probably don’t realize that having their own place in a school with very limited space is incredibly fortunate. I currently do not have a dedicated classroom for every single teacher. We do not have a middle school library. We have one soccer field and one gym that the entire school must share. Despite these limitations we find ways to make it work and we thrive. Our student numbers have increased over the years and we have learned to adjust. I would like to think that we make full use of our facilities and take nothing for granted.
The seniors probably believe the reason for the closure hinges upon a single act of vandalism. I make that assumption because one very responsible individual cleaned up the mess after I closed the lounge and asked if it could be re-opened. As much as I appreciated the effort of this individual, I did not shut the lounge because of one act of vandalism. The graffiti was definitely the catalyst for the closing, but it was simply the last act of many that forced me to make the decision. And I do not blame this on the class of 2010. The acts of vandalism that forced me to close the lounge have gone on for several years without consequences.
The privilege of having a special place comes with responsibility. Over the years, many seniors chose to treat the space with less and less respect. Instead of doing everything they could to guarantee their right and the rights of future seniors to keep this privilege, individuals from each class chose to see how far they could go to challenge and disrupt that privilege. The vandalism would start from day one, escalate throughout the year and culminate in a final act that seemed to have to outdo the previous year. Rather than passing the torch to the next class the goal became to make the place as unwelcoming as possible to the new group. In other words, rather than taking pride in the privilege and passing it to the next group, the idea seemed to be: now that we are leaving we are going to destroy the decency of the place and make the next group suffer if they want to use it.
I know that all the seniors did not participate in vandalizing the lounge and school property. I also know that not all the seniors participated in cleaning and restoring the lounge after the damage done by the previous class. A group of seniors took charge of that task and the others simply benefited from it. I also know that many seniors chose to look the other way as their colleagues committed acts of vandalism, played music louder than was acceptable, and played music during class. I am not sure how many of them gradually joined in on the destruction as these acts grew in boldness and severity with seemingly no consequences to the perpetrators.
I spoke to the seniors at the beginning of the year about the group responsibility necessary to maintaining the privilege of the lounge. I warned them that if they did not police themselves the lounge would be closed. I allowed them many chances throughout the year, yet they continued the same pattern as in previous years. I have no animosity or hard feelings toward the seniors and I would hope the feeling is mutual. However, school is a place for learning. Although many felt that they were entitled to destroy furniture because they purchased it, gradually that attitude was extended to school property. Although it is technically true that much of the furniture was purchased with class funds, I began to wonder what message we were sending: It is OK to raise money through school-sponsored activities in order to purchase furniture that you can destroy. I felt that what each class was learning was that it was OK to treat school property in a disrespectful manner because it was part of tradition. This last act of disrespect crossed a line in my mind and despite threats that the lounge would be closed, no one addressed it, no one took responsibility, and no one seemed to care–until it was too late.
One of the main lessons we should be teaching our children is how to live in a democracy. We have individual freedoms and rights, but both children and adults seem to lose their way when faced with the acts of cowards. One coward ruins it for everyone else, yet we are reluctant to chastise or punish or disapprove of the actions of that one. But we shout loudly and collectively about how unfair we are being treated because of the actions of that one we are willing to hide and protect. I am not asking for a scapegoat or for the group to turn over any vandals. However, if the group valued its privilege it would have acted responsibly and solved this problem. There was never any reason for the adults to be involved.
If we truly value the rights and privileges that we have earned, then we must learn how to protect those rights and privileges rather than take them for granted. I view this incident as I view all events: as a teachable moment. I am open to discussion if students want to talk about how to preserve and maintain their rights and privileges. I am not going to change my decision, but I think a lot can be learned and we can avoid feelings of unfairness in the future if we learn how to be proactive and if we learn how to live as active and caring citizens in a democracy. But I have no interest in discussions that serve only to advance selfish causes.
I continue to admire and respect the class of 2010. I look forward to finishing the year strong and I hope we can maintain a healthy and respectful relationship. As I have told them many times, I am proud of their leadership, their accomplishments, and their individual glories. They have much to learn about privilege and responsibility and I know that they will learn from this. They are a proud, thoughtful, and intelligent group of seniors. It has been my privilege to work for them.